<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reply to Gary Stager&#8217;s HuffPo Post on Duncan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beyond-school.org/2008/12/20/reply-to-stager-on-duncan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beyond-school.org/2008/12/20/reply-to-stager-on-duncan/</link>
	<description>More learning. Less schooliness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:17:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Short Notes: No, I Don&#8217;t Want A Leg Lamp For Christmas &#124; The Jose Vilson</title>
		<link>http://beyond-school.org/2008/12/20/reply-to-stager-on-duncan/comment-page-1/#comment-7096</link>
		<dc:creator>Short Notes: No, I Don&#8217;t Want A Leg Lamp For Christmas &#124; The Jose Vilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyond-school.org/?p=1943#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>[...] much thinking, my thinking falls right in line with Clay Burrell&#8217;s thinking about Arne Duncan. I&#8217;ll reserve judgment until he&#8217;s actually annoyed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much thinking, my thinking falls right in line with Clay Burrell&#8217;s thinking about Arne Duncan. I&#8217;ll reserve judgment until he&#8217;s actually annoyed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Doyle</title>
		<link>http://beyond-school.org/2008/12/20/reply-to-stager-on-duncan/comment-page-1/#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyond-school.org/?p=1943#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of those left-handed all-or-none buttheads who catastrophizes everything, so take this with a grain of salt....

I think Duncan is a bad pick, and I have plenty of reasons why. But Leslie, my wife/friend/lover/philosopher points out the following:

1) Bush is going
2) Things will get better
3) It&#039;s OK to criticize, we&#039;re headed towards a more open government--and Obama, while not perfect, at least will defend his choices.

So I am waiting for the defense. On the other hand, Leslie (again, wisely) notes that it&#039;s no offense to criticize the President, that this new guy might even welcome it.

Hokey smokes, we might even become America again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those left-handed all-or-none buttheads who catastrophizes everything, so take this with a grain of salt&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think Duncan is a bad pick, and I have plenty of reasons why. But Leslie, my wife/friend/lover/philosopher points out the following:</p>
<p>1) Bush is going<br />
2) Things will get better<br />
3) It&#8217;s OK to criticize, we&#8217;re headed towards a more open government&#8211;and Obama, while not perfect, at least will defend his choices.</p>
<p>So I am waiting for the defense. On the other hand, Leslie (again, wisely) notes that it&#8217;s no offense to criticize the President, that this new guy might even welcome it.</p>
<p>Hokey smokes, we might even become America again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.624 seconds -->
