Creators vs. Exam-Takers: A Student Blog Debate, and Prayer for the Death of the SAT
with 6 comments
Print This Post
Shim, a senior in my AP Lit class, started a mini-debate with his post, “Students or Slaves?” Nicole linked and extended, then Jane disagreed, then Daniel jumped in with this
Think about it as Lego. If one wants to build something, the basic pieces are needed. Without the pieces, a building cannot be built. In our lives, education provides us with these rudimentary pieces.
I, as a student, want education to be supposedly “open-minded” and to facilitate creativity as well. But let’s face reality here. We’re ignorant. Before we become supposedly creative and all, we need to learn the rules before we play, just as in sports. We need to learn the laws of Newton to contribute to the scientific field, and we need to savor the works of past literary geniuses in order to become writers.
They’re still not, as a rule, boldly connecting to their (in six short months) adult peers in the blogosphere, but at least they’re connecting with each other. (Ah, the psychology of it all: identity as “student,” not as “young adult.” Self-willed self-walling. “Infantilization.”)
I want to add to the debate with this, from Forbes online (emphasis added):
If the success rate of directed research is very low, though, it is true that the more we search, the more likely we are to find things “by accident,” outside the original plan. Only a disproportionately minute number of discoveries traditionally came from directed academic research. What academia seems more masterful at is public relations and fundraising.
This is good news–for some. Ignore what you were told by your college economics professor and consider the following puzzle. Whenever you hear a snotty European presenting his stereotypes about Americans, he will often describe them as “unintellectual,” “uneducated,” and “poor in math,” because, unlike European schooling, American education is not based on equation drills and memorization.
Yet the person making these statements will likely be addicted to his iPod, wearing a T-shirt and blue jeans, and using Microsoft Word to jot down his “cultural” statements on his Intel-based PC, with some Google searches on the Internet here and there interrupting his composition. If old enough, he might also be using Viagra.
America’s primary export, it appears, is trial-and-error, and the innovative knowledge [I really like that label - CB] attained in such a way. Trial-and-error has error in it; and most top-down traditional rational and academic environments do not like the fallibility of “error” and the embarrassment of not quite knowing where they’re going. The U.S. fosters entrepreneurs and creators, not exam-takers, bureaucrats or, worse, deluded economists. So the perceived weakness of the American pupil in conventional studies is where his or her very strength may lie.
The American system of trial and error produces doers: Black Swan-hunting, dream-chasing entrepreneurs, with a tolerance for a certain class of risk-taking and for making plenty of small errors on the road to success or knowledge. This environment also attracts aggressive tinkering foreigners like this author.
Globalization allowed the U.S. to specialize in the creative aspect of things, the risk-taking production of concepts and ideas–that is, the scalable part of production, in which more income can be generated from the same fixed assets through innovation. By exporting jobs, the U.S. has outsourced the less scalable and more linear components of production, assigning them to the citizens of more mathematical and culturally rigid states, who are happy to be paid by the hour to work on other people’s ideas.
Sort of an aside, sort of related: I’m in my first year teaching senior AP Literature - an externally-assessed course, for-college-credit via timed multiple choice and essay exam brought to you by the creators of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) college entry exam. This is also my first year of teaching seniors, period. I am amazed at the stress, chaos, and lack of academic focus of seniors due to the demands of both the SAT and the College Application process - as well as the demands of too many AP courses strictly, it seems, for the purpose of having a more competitive transcript than the next college applicant.
The irony is, the creativity of the “Black Swan hunters” is the last thing that is rewarded on the SAT.
Are there any moves afoot to unseat the SAT as the arbiter of academic merit in our (American college-bound) young? Do other countries - Australia, New Zealand, the UK - have better forms of college-bound assessments?
[h/t to Stephen Downes' OLDaily for the link to this article.]
If you like this post, please spread it:
(But don't tag it "education." That will bury it.)
- Two Heretical Posts from a Good Student Blog...
- Give Tuna a Subscribe: She’s a Natural Student Blogger...
- A Student Taps in to “Visionary Classroom Blogging”: JungHee’s Mission Moment...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.







Clay,
Some schools in the California system have pushed away from the SAT as a college entry exam, and that has put some pressure on….but…
then again, as I posted the other day, a consortium of large American colleges has decide to do some self-reporting of student success, and one of the measures they will be using is a test designed by the SAT folks. (or a few other ones, like ACT).
So, that doesn’t portent well for it “fading” away.
Frankly, one thing I’ve found interesting for our students–many colleges now only accept scores for a certain number of AP tests. So even when students cram and do well on them for two years of high school, some colleges only accept one or two, or only ones with scores of 5.
So….there seems to be this whole misconception about it that is fostered by the program itself?
I’m sure students who have taken AP classes perform better in college or are somewhat more prepared from a content standpoint, but if the focus is just on the college credits, that will depend ENTIRELY on what college they choose to attend.
[Reply]
Carolyn Foote
24 Nov 07 at 10:25 pm
I think I meant bode well
not portent…sorry!
[Reply]
Carolyn Foote
24 Nov 07 at 10:37 pm
I agree with Daniel that students need a structure, a frame of reference, some “building [Lego] blocks” of facts. Even rockets to unknown galaxies need launching pads!
How to assess and what to assess are very different questions. The “four slide” requirement of the Chicago Graduate School of Business
http://tinyurl.com/yr2g8f
would be one method of gauging creative thinking skills but would not necessary predict an applicant’s ability to be successful in courses the required for a degree.
To use an imperfect “Paradise Lost” analogy: Adam and Eve might have been able to pass a standardized test, but Satan would shine in an alternative creative assessment!
[Reply]
diane
25 Nov 07 at 12:22 am
Thanks, both. It was a poorly-expressed, rushed post, so to clarify:
The Forbes article, if the argument is valid, pointed to the irrelevancy of knowing many of the “building blocks.” The alleged fact that academic research rarely yields successes, and that successful research discoveries come more often from “creative” insights from those who see beyond the rules and established body of knowledge in whatever discipline - that’s what interested me.
Carolyn, I read your post a few days ago, and it’s depressing news for America.
And Diane, I sort of broke it down in a reply to a student’s post that what disturbs me is the “facts and analysis today, creativity always tomorrow” approach in most of our classrooms and assessments.
Speaking of which: time to grade
[Reply]
Clay Burell
25 Nov 07 at 8:17 am
Wow, Diane, I’m not sure how I feel about leading people to a conclusion that compares what we hope for kids to achieve to the way that Satan thinks, but hey, you got my attention!
As far as SATs are concerned, I think the movement going on right now that makes SATs more irrelevant is the realization that the majority of students these days don’t go (and don’t need to go) to a four year university at all. At least, they don’t need to go right out of high school. There’s a major movement to getting college credit in alternative ways after one is already in the workforce and long out of high school. People that “go back” don’t have to take SATs to get placed at all…
[Reply]
Tim Goree
25 Nov 07 at 8:33 am
Ah, but Tim, we’re talking Milton’s Satan - the first “freedom-fighter” in the Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition!
True to pattern though, he does become a dictator himself after gaining power. On earth as it is in Heaven - and Hell?
[Reply]
Clay Burell
25 Nov 07 at 5:52 pm